Real Briefings

City of Bellingham City Council — Committee of the Whole

BEL-CON-CTW-2026-06-15 June 15, 2026 Committee of the Whole City of Bellingham
← Back to All Briefings
Jun
Month
15
Day
Min
Published
Status

The June 15, 2026 Committee of the Whole convened at approximately 2:50 PM with all council members present. The public session was brief, consisting of a single agenda category — Old and New Business — before the committee moved into an approximately one-hour executive session covering a property acquisition update and three potential litigation matters. The only substantive public item was a discussion initiated by Chair Hannah Stone regarding the timing and process for appointing council members to the City's legislative lobbying team. Stone proposed amending the legislative lobbying guide — a document prepared by Legislative Analyst Iris Not — to shift the appointment cycle from the annual January reorganization meeting to the interim period between legislative sessions, typically summer. The practical effect would allow appointed council members to participate in preparation activities before the next legislative session begins. Stone indicated that up to three council members serve in this capacity and invited expressions of interest. Four council members indicated willingness to serve: Councilmember Lindquist (returning, having served the prior year), Councilmember Hammill (returning, having served two cycles ago), Councilmember Cotton (conditional on Friday scheduling), and Councilmember Williams (seeking first appointment to the role). Councilmember Khan offered a lighthearted suggestion to use ranked-choice voting to select from the interested members. The council did not finalize appointments at this meeting. The matter was deferred to the next meeting. There was no objection to the proposed guideline language update — recognizing that appointments would occur annually in the summer between sessions — and that change is expected to move forward. The committee then adjourned into executive session to address: a potential property acquisition comprehensive update (with Perelson, approximately 30 minutes); potential litigation involving Chaplin and Cram

**1. Legislative Lobbying Appointments — Deferred** - **Item:** Appointment of up to three council members to the City's legislative lobbying team - **AB Number:** Not assigned - **Staff Recommendation:** Not specified in source documents - **Council Action:** No vote taken. Discussion opened; decision deferred to the next meeting. - **Practical Effect:** Appointments will be finalized at the next Committee of the Whole or regular Council meeting. Four council members expressed interest: Lindquist, Hammill, Cotton (conditional), and Williams. **2. Legislative Lobbying Guide Language Update — Consensus to Proceed** - **Item:** Amendment to the legislative lobbying guidelines to shift appointment timing from the January reorganization meeting to the summer interim between legislative sessions - **AB Number:** Not as…

About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Legislative Lobbying Appointments and Guideline Timing** The City of Bellingham maintains a legislative lobbying program in which a subset of council members — typically three — work with the City's lobbyists and legislative staff to advance the City's priorities in Olympia during the Washington State legislative session. These individuals coordinate on testimony, letters, and direct engagement with legislators. Chair Stone raised a structural concern about the existing appointment process: under the current guidelines (as documented by Legislative Analyst Iris Not), appointments are tied to the January reorganization meeting, which falls after the legislative session has already begun or is about to begin. Stone proposed shifting appointments to the summer interim period between sessions so that designated council members can participate in preparation activities — including meeting with lobbyists and tracking emerging issues — before the session starts. Stone noted the value of having the Council President involved in the lobbying team, given their role in speaking on behalf of the council and signing off on official letters. She also acknowledged the tension between continuity (returning members bring institutional knowledge) and rotation (fresh voices bring different perspectives). Three spots are available. Four council members expressed interest: - **Lindquist** expressed willingness to return but deferred to new members if all three spots were sought by colleagues without prior service. - **Hammill** indicated willingness to return, noting he served two cycles ago. - **Cotton** expressed conditional interest, stati…
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Chair Hannah Stone** — Initiated the discussion on legislative lobbying appointment timing. Advocated for shifting appointments to the summer interim period between sessions. Expressed support for including the Council President in the lobbying team. Deferred the appointment decision to the next meeting at the suggestion of other members. **Councilmember Lindquist** — Expressed interest in returning to the lobbying team but showed willingness to step aside if other council members without prior service wanted the spots: "I did serve last year so I think it should be some consideration if there's room I'd like to serve if there's three new people maybe not." **Councilmember Daniel Hammill** — Expressed willingness to serve again, noting prior service two cycles ago. **Councilmember Jace Cotton** — Ex…
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Councilmember Lindquist, on interest in returning to the legislative lobbying team:** "Well I'm certainly interested again but I did serve last year so I think it should be some consideration if there's room I'd like to serve if there's three new people maybe not." **Councilmember Jace Cotton, on scheduling as a factor in his decision:** "I'd be interested if it was still Fridays at lunchtime. So it's more of a scheduling question." **Deputy City Administrator Janice Keller, confirming Fr…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →

| Item | Action Needed | Target Date | |---|---|---| | Legislative lobbying appointments (3 seats) | Final appointments to be made | Next Committee of the Whole or Council meeting | | Legislative lobbying guide language update | Administrative update to guidelines (summer appointment timing) | Ongoing — no specific deadline stated | | Executive session — property acquisition | N…

About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Before this meeting:** - Legislative lobbying guide called for appointments at or around the January reorganization meeting. - No council members had formally expressed interest in lobbying team appointments for the upcoming cycle. - The Oldham v. City of Bellingham executive session item was on the agenda. **After this meeting:** - Consensus reached — with no objections — to update the lobbying guide to shift appointment timing to the summer interim between legis…
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
--- # Bellingham Committee of the Whole — June 15, 2026 ## Meeting Overview The Bellingham City Council's Committee of the Whole convened on the afternoon of Monday, June 15, 2026, at approximately 2:50 p.m. in Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, 210 Lottie Street. All council members were present: Chair Hannah Stone, along with Hollie Huthman, Daniel Hammill, Edwin H. "Skip" Williams, Lisa Anderson, Michael Lilliquist, and Jace Cotton. The meeting was held in a hybrid format, available for in-person attendance or live viewing through BTV, Comcast, and the City's YouTube channel. The afternoon session was a brief one by design. A single substantive item occupied the public portion of the meeting: a discussion about the timing and process for appointing council members to the city's legislative lobbying team. Several council members expressed interest in serving, but the group chose not to finalize appointments that afternoon, deferring the decision to the next meeting. The committee then moved on to a lengthy executive session covering four items — a potential property acquisition and three potential litigation matters — which was expected to consume just over an hour. The meeting opened with an unusual note. Chair Stone paused before proceeding to agenda business to relay a public safety alert that had come through during an earlier committee session: Whatcom County was experiencing a disruption to 911 services. She asked that…
About 14% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
null…
About 100% shown — premium members only Upgrade to premium →

Share This Briefing