Real Briefings

Bellingham City Council

BEL-CON-SPC-2026-10-05 October 05, 2026 Committee of the Whole City of Bellingham
← Back to All Briefings
Oct
Month
05
Day
—
Min
Published
Status

The Bellingham City Council convened a special meeting on the morning of October 5, 2026, for the first of three scheduled budget work sessions on the City's 2027 Preliminary Budget. The session covered internal and administrative departments — Finance, Legal, Human Resources, Information Technology, Communications, Planning and Community Development, and the Mayor's Office — under Agenda Bill 25085. No formal votes were taken; this was a deliberative work session. The overarching fiscal context dominated the meeting: the City is navigating a period of sustained budget pressure driven by rising personnel costs — particularly healthcare — against a largely fixed revenue base. The 2027 Preliminary Budget totals approximately $542.8 million, nearly identical to the prior year's $542.9 million proposed budget, a difference of roughly $100,000. Finance Director Andy Esjornson described the preliminary budget as among the most balanced he has seen, with revenues and expenditures differing by approximately $150,000. The most significant structural change in the 2027 budget is the creation of a new Central Services Fund (Fund 580), which consolidates Finance, Human Resources, the civil division of the Legal Department, and the new Communications Department out of the General Fund and into an internal service fund. This change, which mirrors a move the City made with IT several years ago, is intended to make the true cost of administrative services visible across all departments rather than burying those costs within the General Fund. The fund is projected to bring in $10.2 million, with the General Fund contributing approximately $3.25 million of that total. A second major theme was the Regional Fire Authority (RFA) ballot measure, which Mayor Kim Lund and Finance Director Esjornson identified as central to the City's fiscal future. The 2027 budget represents what the mayor called an "optimistic budget" — one that does not model a RFA failure scenario. If the RFA does no

This was an informational work session. No formal votes were taken. The following are the significant administrative and policy decisions reflected in the 2027 Preliminary Budget as presented: **1. Creation of Central Services Fund (Fund 580)** - **AB:** 25085 (budget work session) - **What it is:** Finance, HR, and the civil division of Legal are consolidated from the General Fund into a new internal service fund. The new Communications Department is also housed in this fund. - **Fund size:** $10.2 million total; General Fund contribution approximately $3.25 million. - **Prior structure:** These costs were embedded in the General Fund and charged to other funds via an internal allocation process (IAP). The change makes charges visible at the department level (fire, police, utilities, etc.). - **Council note:** Council members asked whether hearing examiner costs would remain identifiable; staff confirmed they can be pulled as a "group activity" within the non-departmental catego…

About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
Members only Sign up free →
**Finance Director Andy Esjornson** — Presented the budget as structurally sound and nearly balanced. Confident the City will not need to draw on emergency reserves in 2026 based on August performance, but declined to promise specific outcomes. Defended the Central Services Fund reorganization as a transparency improvement. Advocated for maintaining budget discipline through held positions and delayed expenditures rather than structural cuts. **Mayor Kim Lund** — Characterized the 2027 budget as an "optimistic budget" and argued against releasing a formal RFA-failure scenario before the election, citing the risk of unnecessary employee alarm. Emphasized the importance of sustaining service levels. Highlighted climate action accomplishments including a planned solar array on water treatment tanks and an electric car-share program. **Council President Hannah Stone** — Raised the unfunded mandate issue early and indicated interest in lobbying Olympia during the upcoming legislative session. Asked about reserve policies and future budget outlook clarity. **Council Member Michael Lilliquist** — Most technically detailed questioner of the session. Pressed on reappropriation mechanics, reserve calculations, hearing examiner budget visibility, and the pace of code rewrite work. Agreed with Huthman that the Council should be more explicit — at least internally — about the RFA-failure budget scenario. **Council Member Lisa Anderson** — Asked about cybersecurity staffing adequacy, preliminary budget document availability online (flagged that prior preliminary budgets appeared to have been removed from the City website), and hearing examiner cost visibility. **Council Member Hollie Huthman** — Requested a formal presentation on reserve policy — when the City may draw reserves, what the three-year recovery obligation looks like, and how those policies interact with the current budget. Expressed interest in seeing both budget scenarios. Drew on extensive professional experience with enterprise system rollouts to probe Workday …
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Finance Director Andy Esjornson, on the Central Services Fund accounting change:** "So instead of sort of getting laundered through the general fund and disappearing, it's all happening in this." **Mayor Kim Lund, on the RFA-failure budget scenario:** "We felt like we wanted to put forth — if we call it the optimistic budget — because it's we don't want to create unnecessary tension and anxiety and undue stress and burden for the city teams on what's a hypothetical." **Mayor Kim Lund, on t…
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →

- **October 5, 2026, 1:00 PM:** Regular Committee of the Whole meeting reconvenes (same day, adjourned from this special meeting) - **October 15, 2026:** Planning Commission receives first informational presentation on residential development regulation revisions, Critical Areas Ordinance update, and Unified Development Code reform - **October 19, 2026:** Second budget work session (City Council regular meeting); Planning and Community Development Department to present code rewrite work plan informational item to City Council - **Late October 2026:** HR expects to begin reviewing candidates for healthcare strategic analysis position (second search) - **Mid-December 2026:** Target go-live for Workday human capital management system - **End of December 2026:** Temporary positions supporting Workday implementation expected to conclude - **End of November 2026:** Target hire date for healthcare strategic analysis position - **November 2026:** Planning and Community Development to appear before Growth Management Hearings Board on comprehensive plan compliance challenge - **January 2027 (anticipated):** New successor bargaining agreements for police guild, Whatcom Dispatchers Guild, IAFF Local 10 and 106, and Teamsters Local 231 expected to take effect - **January 2027:** Coast Guard veteran intern begins with Communi…

About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**After this meeting compared to before:** 1. **Council is formally aware — for the first time in a work session format — that the 2027 budget does not model an RFA-failure scenario.** The mayor explicitly named this the "optimistic budget." Before this meeting, the dual-scenario question had not been publicly aired at this level of directness. 2. **The Central Services Fund structure is confirmed as the proposed accounting change for 2027.** Finance, HR, Legal (civil division), and Communications will no longer appear as General Fund line items; they will be charged to departments through Fund 580. This is a structural change from the prior IAP model. 3. **The Hearing Examiner is no longer budgeted as a standalone department.** The 0.5 FTE moves to Finance; the contract costs move to non-departmental. This organizational change is confirmed in the proposed budget. 4. **The new Communications Department is formally introduced and its scope is defined.** Public Works communications staff are explicitly excluded from the 2027 consolidation, with a dotted-line relationship maintained. 5. **Council has been put on not…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
null…
About 100% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
null…
About 100% shown — premium members only Upgrade to premium →

Share This Briefing