Real Briefings

Whatcom County Planning Commission

WHA-PLN-2025-09-30 September 30, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting Whatcom County 27 min
← Back to All Briefings
Sep
Month
30
Day
27
Min
Published
Status

The Whatcom County Planning Commission held a special meeting on September 30, 2025, to advance two of the most consequential elements of the county's 2025 Comprehensive Plan update: the Climate Element (Chapter 12) and Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundary proposals submitted by cities throughout the county. The meeting ran from 1:03 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. and produced seventeen motions, of which nine passed, four failed, two were withdrawn, and two received no second. On the climate side, the commission took up a series of amendments to Chapter 12 and voted unanimously — 9-0 — to forward the chapter to the County Council with amendments. Key changes adopted during the session included adding language softening building code advocacy language, adding a new wetlands mitigation bank policy, and narrowing the scope of tribal consultation language in a Climate Commitment Act funding policy to tribes with "treaty rights or interests in the project area." This language resolved a multi-meeting dispute over how broadly the county should cast its consultation net when applying for state Climate Commitment Act funds. The UGA work session produced sharply divided votes on boundary proposals submitted by Sumas, Bellingham, Ferndale, Everson, and the Columbia Valley area. A motion to remove all agricultural lands from Sumas's UGA expansion failed on a 4-4 tie, but a compromise amendment to protect only the southernmost proposed parcel — the most actively farmed portion — passed 6-2. A high-stakes motion by Commissioner Greif to restructure Bellingham's UGA by reverting a north-area addition and redirecting expansion to the south failed 1-6. A related motion to elevate the South Yew Street UGA reserve to full UGA status also tied 4-4 and failed. Critically, a motion by Commissioner Browne to amend rural zoning county-wide in RR-2, RR-3, and STC zones to allow duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes where public water is available — but limited to the Custer, Pole & Guide, and Hinotes Corne

**Motion 1 — Policy 12.9.5: Soften "Revise" to "Consider Revising"** - **Mover/Seconder:** Moceri / Van Dalen - **Vote:** 8 Ayes, 0 Nays, 1 Abstain (Eisenberg) — **Passed** - **Effect:** Reduces the prescriptive character of Policy 12.9.5 (related to Flow Control Ordinance revision) from a directive to a suggestion. Staff memo noted this policy relates to the Whatcom County Solid Waste Advisory Committee's recommendation to review the construction and demolition waste exemption. **Motion 2 — Policy 12.2.1: Change "Implement" to "Continue to Implement" Washington State Building Code Requirements** - **Mover/Seconder:** Dunne / Moceri - **Vote:** 9 Ayes, 0 Nays, 0 Abstain — **Passed** - **Effect:** Acknowledges that the county is already complying with state building code requirements rather than implying the policy is a new directive. **Motion 3 — Strike Policy 12.2.9 (Advocate for Building Code Updates)** - **Mover/Seconder:** Dunne / Van Dalen - **Vote:** 6 Ayes, 2 Nays (Hansen…

About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
Members only Sign up free →
**Lauren Clemens, Climate Action Manager, Whatcom County Public Works:** Presented staff responses to prior commission questions on Chapter 12. Indicated that Commerce review of the GHG sub-element by November 1 is not feasible and the county is seeking a flexible comment process. Supported the commission's direction on tribal consultation language and wetlands mitigation banking. **Matt Aamot, Senior Planner, Whatcom County Planning and Development Services:** Facilitated the UGA work session. Provided technical context on UGA reserve history (created by Whatcom County in the 2009 review cycle, not required by GMA), LAMIR D zoning mechanics, and the Columbia Valley subarea plan history. Advised the commission that the rural forestry-to-commercial forestry motion would require additional SEPA analysis if applied broadly. **Mark Personius, Planning Director, Whatcom County:** Clarified that under GMA, the County Council holds final authority to set UGA boundaries, though boundaries must be coordinated and consistent with city plans. Advised withdrawing the Blaine motion in favor of waiting for the scheduled October 9 public hearing. **Michael Cerbone, Community Development Director, City of Ferndale:** Clarified that Ferndale's position was flexibility: the city wants its UGA reserves included, but is willing to defer to a later planning cycle if the commission prefers. Ultimately expressed willingness to proceed either way. **Carson Cortez, City Planner, City of Sumas:** Presented Sumas's land capacity analysis showing a deficit of 520 housing units within the current UGA and a current population capacity of only 242 additional residents. Indicated the city targets 10–20 units per acre in its high-density residential zone for proposed UGA expansion areas. Confirmed the southernmost expansion area is on actively farmed land; the western area is largely pasture, trees, and hobby farms. Could not commit to a compromise reduction in expansion size without City Council direction. **Chris Behee, Planner, City of Bellingham:** Presented a detailed comparison of Bellingham's north and south UGA reserve areas. Advocated strongly for the north area as the appropriate expansion location based on housing capacity (1,300 vs. 225 units), terrain, transit feasibility, employment proximity, and fiscal capacity. Stated the city opposes any motion to revert its north area or add the south area to UGA status. Noted that the city's updated annexation policies, recently approved by its planning commission, would require dense urban development — not suburban sprawl — in any annexed areas. **Commissioner Rud Browne:** Consistently opposed motions to restrict UGA expansion into agricultural land, arguing that cities surrounded entirely by agricultural land have no meaningful alternative. Supported the LAMIR D middle housing amendment and the Columbia Valley industrial designation. Raised technical concern about water main costs for agricultural land offset ($1.5 million per mile). Frequently cited the 2021 Sumas flood as context for the importance of directing growth away from flood plains…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Commissioner Van Dalen, on the Sumas emission baseline issue:** "Is that because of Intelco closing? And if that if that is then 2022 is probably a bad baseline. 2017 is probably better for us because there's actively recruiting and I think maybe somebody's even going into that facility or trying to so. I wouldn't count any of those savings that we got. Maybe the one that goes in is less than in Telco, but it's still going to be a big chunk. So if we are basing off 2022, the second that goes …
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →

- **October 9, 2025 — Regular Planning Commission Meeting (1:00 p.m.):** - Public hearing: City of Blaine UGA proposal (public comment expected; no vote anticipated October 9) - Public hearing: Chapter 5 Utilities element - Open space application (anticipated brief) - No vote on Blaine UGA on October 9 per Planning Director Personius's guidance - **October 30, 2025 — Special Planning Commission Meeting (6:00 p.m.):** - Chapter 10: Environment work session - **Within 3 weeks of September 30:** City/County Planner Group expected to report back on whether jurisdictions collectively support withdrawing UGA reserve expansions from current cycle to 2026–2027 annual docket. Individual city responses were requested by PDS staff. - **County Council:** Chapter 12 (Climate Element) forwarded for council discussion. No council hearing date specified in this meeting. …

About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Chapter 12 — Climate Element:** - Policy 12.9.5 changed from "revise" to "consider revising" the Flow Control Ordinance's construction and demolition waste exemption. - Policy 12.2.1 changed from "implement" to "continue to implement" state building code requirements. - Policy 12.2.9, which advocated for building code updates to increase energy efficiency, **deleted**. - New Policy 12.11.7 **added**: "Support the creation of Whatcom County wetlands mitigation banks that can be used by public and private development." - Policy 12.3.1 tribal consultation language **narrowed**: tribes to be consulted when applying for Climate Commitment Act funds are now limited to those "with treaty rights or interests in the project area." - Chapter 12 **forwarded to County Council** — first time it advances beyond the Planning Commission in this update cycle. **UGA Proposals:** - **Sumas:** The southernmost proposed UGA parcel (currently agricultural, proposed to convert to UGA) will be recommended to remain in agricultural designation. All other Sumas UGA/UGAR pro…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
--- ## Meeting Overview The Whatcom County Planning Commission convened a special meeting on the afternoon of September 30, 2025, called to order at 1:03 p.m. by Chair Kelvin Barton in a hybrid format at 5280 Northwest Drive in Bellingham. Most of the ten-member commission was present at the start: Kelvin Barton, Suneeta Eisenberg, Rud Browne, Julie Jefferson, Daniel Dunne, Dominic Moceri, and Scott Van Dalen were present for roll call. Jim Hansen arrived at 1:09 p.m. and Nicholas Greif at 1:10 p.m., both noted for the record. Eisenberg left the meeting at 2:07 p.m., reducing the body to eight for most of the afternoon's UGA deliberations. Staff attending included Planning Director Mark Personius, Climate Action Manager Lauren Clemens, Senior Planner Matt Aamot, and planning staff Maddie Schacht, Gary Stoyka, and coordinator Aileen Kogut-Aguon. City planners from Ferndale, Sumas, and Bellingham were present virtually throughout the UGA session; the City of Blaine had deferred its presentation entirely to October 9th. The agenda carried two items, both framed as work sessions: a continuation of the commission's review of Chapter 12 (Climate) of the 2025 Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan update, and a working session on urban growth area (UGA) proposals from the county's cities. Neither item was routine. The climate session was the third time commissioners had worked through the chapter — following a joint commission-council session on August 6th and a hearing and work session on August 14th — and the commission needed to vote on forwarding the chapter to the County Council before the day was over. The UGA session was the operational heart of the meeting: commissioners arrived with prepared motions on Ferndale, Sumas, Everson, Bellingham, and Columbia Valley, and the afternoon became a sustained argument about where growth should go, whether agricultural land should be sacrificed for it, and what the planning commission's proper role is in that decision. The meeting stretched more than three hours past its scheduled 1:00–4:00 window. By the time it adjourned at 4:30 p.m., the commission had passed nine motions with recorded votes, seen four motions fail, watched two motions withdrawn before a vote, and left three of Commissioner Greif's prepared motions untried for lack of a second. The session was dense with the substance of comprehensive planning — allocation numbers, flood-plain geometry, soil quality, the legal architecture of the Growth Management A…
About 4% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
--- ### Meeting Overview The Whatcom County Planning Commission held a special meeting and work session on September 30, 2025, running from approximately 1:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. at 5280 Northwest Drive in Bellingham. The commission focused on two major agenda items: a continuation of their review of Chapter 12 (Climate) of the 2025 Comprehensive Plan update, and a work session on Urban Growth Area (UGA) proposals from cities across the county. The meeting resulted in five amendments to the climate chapter and a series of votes on UGA-related motions, with several passing and several failing. --- ### Key Terms and Concepts **Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan):** A long-range planning document required by Washington State law that guides a county or city's land use, housing, transportation, and other development decisions over a 20-year planning horizon. Whatcom County is currently conducting its periodic update to the 2016 plan. **Urban Growth Area (UGA):** A boundary established under the Growth Management Act (GMA) that designates where urban-level development is expected and where cities may expand. Development within UGAs is served by urban infrastructure such as water, sewer, and roads. **UGA Reserve (UGAR):** A designation created by Whatcom County (not required by state law) that identifies land adjacent to a UGA that may be considered for future urban expansion in a later planning cycle. It does not carry a population allocation. **Growth Management Act (GMA):** Washington State law (RCW 36.70A) that requires cities and counties above certain population thresholds to plan for growth, protect critical areas and resource lands, and coordinate planning across jurisdictions. **Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Reduction Sub-element:** A new required element of comprehensive plans under House Bill 1181 (2023). It requires jurisdictions to adopt goals and policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and per capita vehicle miles traveled. **LAMIRD (Limited Area of More Intense Rural Development):** Areas in rural parts of a county where a small amount of more intensive development already exists and is allowed to continue. Under state law, these areas must be limited in size and cannot be expanded to include new areas. **Wetlands Mitigation Bank:** A system where wetland areas are restored, created, or enhanced at one location to offset wetland impacts caused by development elsewhere. Mitigation is typically organized by watershed sub-basin. **Climate Commitment Act (CCA):** Washington State legislation (2021) that established a cap-and-invest program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Local governments applying for CCA funds must consult with federally recognized tribes that have treaty rights or interests in the project area. **Menu of Measures:** A guidance tool developed by the Washington Department of Commerce that provides example policy language for jurisdictions to use in developing their climate elements. Local governments are encouraged to adapt these measures to local conditions. **Middle Housing:** A range of housing types between single-family homes and large apartment buildings — including duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and townhomes — that are encouraged by recent state legislation to increase housing capacity and affordability. --- ### Key People at This Meeting | Name | Role / Affiliation | |---|---| | Kelvin Barton | Planning Commission Chair | | Rud Browne | Planning Commissioner | | Daniel Dunne | Planning…
About 30% shown — premium members only Upgrade to premium →

Share This Briefing