Property Tax Search
Home › Comp Plans › Whatcom County › Capital Facilities
Whatcom County · WC-CP-2021 · Pages 1-7

Capital Facilities

Chapter 4 establishes Whatcom County's framework for planning, financing, and delivering capital facilities—including public buildings, parks, law enforcement, corrections, and emergency management—within the county's financial capacity and consistent with GMA concurrency requirements. It adopts level-of-service standards for parks, trails, and fire protection, and requires a biennial six-year Capital Improvement Program tied to realistic funding sources. The chapter also incorporates by reference the capital facilities plans of multiple school districts, fire districts, and utility providers serving unincorporated UGAs.

Capital Facilities Taxes Economy Governance Safety

“Only 4 of 43 Capital Facilities policies (9%) include a concrete, measurable commitment.” Real Record SAY vs DO analysis · Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan

About this analysis

Real Record applies the SAY vs DO accountability framework to every chapter of every Washington comprehensive plan we publish. Each policy in the chapter is read individually and scored into one of four buckets:

  • Measurable — the policy names a specific target, deadline, dollar amount, or action that can be verified later.
  • Strong — binding action language (“shall,” “will adopt,” “require”) without a measurable threshold.
  • Aspirational — encouraging or supportive language (“encourage,” “support,” “consider”) with no enforcement.
  • Monitor only — policies that commit to tracking or reporting but not to action.

The accountability score shown in the sidebar is the share of policies in the chapter that landed in the “Measurable” bucket. A score of 0–19 (red) indicates most policies use aspirational language without concrete accountability; 20–49 (orange) is mixed; 50 or higher (green) means the chapter is dominated by measurable commitments.

The underlying text comes from the official adopted comprehensive plan published by the Whatcom County planning department. Scoring is performed by Real Record analysts using a structured rubric; the raw policy text and bucket assignments are archived in the Real Record civic data warehouse.

Read the full methodology, sources, and rubric at Real Record · About.

What the Plan Promises
Formal targets adopted in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan.
developed parks 9.6 acres per 1,000 population; trails 0.60 miles per 1,000 population; urban fire response time 8 minutes 80% of time (staffed station); urban fire response time 10 minutes 80% of time (unstaffed station) or WSRB Rating 6; rural fire response time 12 minutes 80% of time (staffed station); rural fire response time 14 minutes 80% of time (unstaffed station) or WSRB Rating 8; CIP updated at least biennially
Goals (12 total)
  • Goal 4A: Within the county's financial capacity, adopt a carefully planned program of county services and facilities.
  • Goal 4B: Develop a six-year financing program for capital facilities that meets GMA requirements, achieves adopted levels-of-service, and is within financial capability.
  • Goal 4C: Locate county facilities serving urban populations within identified urban growth areas (UGAs).
  • Goal 4D: Develop and implement a coordinated program of facility improvements for law enforcement and corrections functions.
  • Goal 4E: Develop a realistic long-range program of facility expansion or improvement to accommodate projected staffing requirements.
  • Goal 4F: Achieve level of service standards for parks and trails and support the Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan.
  • Goal 4G: Coordinate with non-county facility providers to support the future land use pattern promoted by this plan.
  • Goal 4H: Maintain effective concurrency measures and procedures for all facilities and services necessary for development.
  • Goal 4I: Consider alternative funding sources for needed county facilities.
  • Goal 4J: Ensure that capital facilities provide protection for threatened and endangered fish and wildlife species.
  • Goal 4K: Enable school districts and fire districts to receive mitigation/impact fees by adopting their capital facilities plans into this plan.
  • Goal 4L: Adopt special district and county capital facility plans for unincorporated UGAs into this plan by reference.
Stronger Policy Language (26 policies in this chapter)
  • Policy 4A-4: The land use element of the comprehensive plan must be reassessed to ensure that land use is coordinated and consistent with the financing plan within the capital facilities element.
  • Policy 4B-1: Maintain and update, on at least a biennial basis, a six-year capital improvement program (CIP) that identifies projects, outlines a schedule, and designates realistic funding sources for all county capital projects.
  • Policy 4D-2: Maintain Sheriff's Office adult corrections facilities and headquarters to provide a safe environment for the community, staff and inmates.
  • Policy 4G-1: Establish interagency planning mechanisms to assure coordinated and mutually supportive capital facility plans from special districts, cities, and other major non-county facility providers.
  • Policy 4H-1: Based on established levels of service for all road segments under control of the county, administer a concurrency management program that provides for consistent and predictable evaluation of impacts.
  • Policy 4J-2: Projects selected for the Six-Year Capital Improvement Program shall not degrade habitat for threatened and endangered species.
Show all 26 stronger policies
The four examples above are a representative sample. The remaining 22 stronger policies are catalogued in the Real Record civic data warehouse and indexed by policy number against the adopted plan text. See how policies are scored →
Aspirational / Monitoring Language (13 policies in this chapter)
  • Policy 4A-3: Evaluate all types of county facilities to determine whether they should serve countywide or strictly unincorporated areas.
  • Policy 4E-2: Investigate alternatives to capital facility construction through the private sector, and pursue technologically feasible alternatives.
  • Policy 4F-2: Seek non-capital opportunities to acquire, enhance and maintain park lands, trails, and other recreational facilities. Consider partnering with cities, school districts, park & recreation districts and others...
  • Policy 4I-1: After all other financing options have been exhausted, consider the use of bonded indebtedness to finance major capital investments in infrastructure.
  • Policy 4I-2: Identify and promote public private partnerships to provide and enhance the provision of necessary services.
  • Policy 4J-1: Fish and wildlife habitat should be carefully considered when selecting projects for the Six-Year Capital Improvement Program.
  • Policy 4J-3: Projects selected for the Six-Year Capital Improvement Program should strive to restore degraded habitat for threatened and endangered species, when the projects are in direct contact with such habitat.
Show all 13 aspirational / monitoring policies
The four examples above are a representative sample. The remaining 9 policies in this bucket use language like “encourage,” “support,” “consider,” or “monitor” — phrasing that does not create an enforceable commitment. See how policies are scored →

SAY vs DISCUSS: Did this come up in meetings?

Real Record has not yet indexed any Whatcom County briefings tagged to this chapter’s topics. Browse all Whatcom County council and planning briefings to see related discussions in context.

View Whatcom County Briefings →

SAY vs DO: Where the Money Goes

Departments related to Capital Facilities in Whatcom County — what the city actually funds, year over year.

Budget analysis for this chapter is in progress. Real Record has mapped 1 Whatcom County department to this chapter, but the FY2006 / FY2025 line-item totals are not yet loaded into our civic data warehouse. In the meantime, browse the city-wide budget comparison on the index page.