Property Tax Search
Home › Comp Plans › Bellingham › Environment
Bellingham · BEL-CP-2025 · Pages 104-113

Environment

The Environment chapter establishes policies to protect, enhance, and restore Bellingham's aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, including lakes, streams, wetlands, forests, and wildlife habitats, while managing growth impacts. It requires use of best available science and mitigation sequencing to safeguard critical areas, and mandates coordination among City departments and regional partners to address water quality, contaminated sites, and natural hazard vulnerabilities. The chapter also recognizes the environment's role in human health, promoting environmental equity, clean air, and community access to nature.

Environment Environment Social Governance

“Only 1 of 41 Environment policies (2%) include a concrete, measurable commitment.” Real Record SAY vs DO analysis · Bellingham Comprehensive Plan

About this analysis

Real Record applies the SAY vs DO accountability framework to every chapter of every Washington comprehensive plan we publish. Each policy in the chapter is read individually and scored into one of four buckets:

  • Measurable — the policy names a specific target, deadline, dollar amount, or action that can be verified later.
  • Strong — binding action language (“shall,” “will adopt,” “require”) without a measurable threshold.
  • Aspirational — encouraging or supportive language (“encourage,” “support,” “consider”) with no enforcement.
  • Monitor only — policies that commit to tracking or reporting but not to action.

The accountability score shown in the sidebar is the share of policies in the chapter that landed in the “Measurable” bucket. A score of 0–19 (red) indicates most policies use aspirational language without concrete accountability; 20–49 (orange) is mixed; 50 or higher (green) means the chapter is dominated by measurable commitments.

The underlying text comes from the official adopted comprehensive plan published by the Bellingham planning department. Scoring is performed by Real Record analysts using a structured rubric; the raw policy text and bucket assignments are archived in the Real Record civic data warehouse.

Read the full methodology, sources, and rubric at Real Record · About.

Goals (4 total)
  • EV-A: Protect Aquatic Ecosystems – Protect and improve aquatic ecosystems including lakes, streams, wetlands, floodplains and the Salish Sea
  • EV-B: Protect Terrestrial Ecosystems – Protect and improve terrestrial ecosystems
  • EV-C: Natural Resource Management – Protect and improve natural systems and ensure environmental sustainability through coordinated natural resource management
  • EV-D: Human Health and Environment – Recognize the environment's inherent value and essential role in supporting human health and wellbeing
Stronger Policy Language (24 policies in this chapter)
  • EV-6: Manage the city's surface and stormwater to protect aquatic resources, improve fish habitat, respond to flooding and erosion damages, and reduce the discharge of pollutants.
  • EV-11: Adopt, implement and update a comprehensive urban forest plan to support a healthy and resilient urban forest through well-coordinated, consistent, efficient and sustainable management.
  • EV-20: Require mitigation sequencing early in project planning stages to safeguard ecological functions and values.
  • EV-37: Protect people and public resources and facilities from injury, loss of life or property damage due to landslides, erosion, seismic events or flooding.
Show all 24 stronger policies
The four examples above are a representative sample. The remaining 20 stronger policies are catalogued in the Real Record civic data warehouse and indexed by policy number against the adopted plan text. See how policies are scored →
Aspirational / Monitoring Language (16 policies in this chapter)
  • EV-25: Support ecological functions and the restoration of natural systems by promoting the use of native plants, controlling the spread of invasive species.
  • EV-26: Provide opportunities for public education and engagement to promote awareness and responsible individual actions for environmental stewardship.
  • EV-38: Encourage and expand access to nature and green spaces to foster human health and connection with the environment.
  • EV-40: Encourage regenerative ecological design, which focuses on creating human and natural systems that work together.
Show all 16 aspirational / monitoring policies
The four examples above are a representative sample. The remaining 12 policies in this bucket use language like “encourage,” “support,” “consider,” or “monitor” — phrasing that does not create an enforceable commitment. See how policies are scored →

SAY vs DISCUSS: Did this come up in meetings?

Real Record has not yet indexed any Bellingham briefings tagged to this chapter’s topics. Browse all Bellingham council and planning briefings to see related discussions in context.

View Bellingham Briefings →

SAY vs DO: Where the Money Goes

Departments related to Environment in Bellingham — what the city actually funds, year over year.

Budget analysis for this chapter is in progress. Real Record has mapped 3 Bellingham departments to this chapter, but the FY2006 / FY2025 line-item totals are not yet loaded into our civic data warehouse. In the meantime, browse the city-wide budget comparison on the index page.